advocatemmmohan

apex court held that 

LAND ACQUISITION – NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT – APPLICABILITY OF RFCTLARR ACT, 2013 – SOLATIUM – FINALITY OF COMPENSATION – SECTION 37 APPEALS – JUST COMPENSATION

A. National Highways Act, 1956 – RFCTLARR Act, 2013 – Fourth Schedule – Applicability of beneficial provisions – Guidelines dated 28.12.2017

Where acquisition under National Highways Act falls within enactments included in Fourth Schedule to RFCTLARR Act, 2013, beneficial provisions relating to compensation, solatium and rehabilitation become applicable by virtue of Central Government orders and MORTH guidelines – Land owners entitled to benefits under 2013 Act.
(Paras 10 to 14)

Facts Analysis:

Land acquired for widening/four-laning of NH-71. Notification under Section 3A issued on 07.08.2013 and Section 3D notification on 26.02.2014. CALA awarded compensation for agricultural, commercial and residential land with 30% solatium. Arbitrator later awarded 100% solatium and interest thereon relying upon 2013 Act and subsequent governmental guidelines.
(Paras 3 to 7)

Ratio:

Acquisitions under NH Act covered by Fourth Schedule are entitled to beneficial provisions of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 pursuant to statutory orders and governmental guidelines extending such benefits.
(Paras 10 to 14)

---

B. Section 30 of RFCTLARR Act – Solatium – 100% solatium payable on compensation determined by CALA

Under Section 30(1) of RFCTLARR Act, solatium equivalent to 100% of compensation determined by Collector/CALA is mandatory – Solatium is in addition to compensation and not independent thereof.
(Paras 16 to 19)

Law Analysis:

Court interpreted Section 30 and held:

• Solatium is linked to compensation already determined.
• Explanation to Section 30 clarifies that solatium is additional compensation for compulsory acquisition.
• Once compensation determined by CALA attains finality, 100% solatium must be calculated on same compensation amount.

(Paras 16 to 19)

Ratio:

When compensation determined by CALA is accepted by parties and attains finality, 100% solatium under Section 30 RFCTLARR Act is payable on such compensation itself and no fresh recalculation is required merely for quantifying solatium.
(Paras 16 to 19)

---

C. Arbitration under Section 3G(5) NH Act – Finality of compensation – NHAI cannot seek recalculation only for solatium purposes

Where NHAI accepted compensation awarded by CALA and did not independently challenge market value before Arbitrator, compensation attains finality – NHAI cannot subsequently seek setting aside of award merely for notional recalculation of compensation to reduce solatium liability.
(Paras 18 to 20)

Facts Analysis:

Only land owners invoked arbitration under Section 3G(5). Arbitrator declined enhancement of market value but granted 100% solatium and interest. NHAI later contended compensation should be recalculated under First Schedule before computing solatium. Court rejected contention because compensation itself was never challenged by NHAI.
(Paras 18 to 20)

Ratio:

Once compensation determined by CALA is accepted and unchallenged by acquiring authority, same attains finality and cannot be reopened indirectly under guise of recalculating solatium.
(Paras 18 to 20)

---

D. Just compensation – Litigation under land acquisition not adversarial

Proceedings between acquiring authority and land owners are not adversarial in strict sense – Object of law is to ensure payment of just compensation to persons deprived of property compulsorily.
(Para 22)

Law Analysis:

Court emphasized welfare-oriented approach in land acquisition jurisprudence and discouraged unnecessary prolongation of litigation when no prejudice or financial loss to acquiring authority is demonstrated.
(Paras 20 to 22)

Ratio:

Land acquisition litigation must be guided by principle of ensuring fair and just compensation rather than technical adversarial contest between State/NHAI and land owners.
(Para 22)

---

FACTS AND LAW ANALYSIS

1. Acquisition initiated for widening of National Highway No.71 in District Sangrur, Punjab.
2. CALA awarded compensation for different categories of land along with 30% solatium and additional compensation.
3. Arbitrator refused enhancement of market value but granted:
   • 100% solatium;
   • interest on solatium;
   • interest @ 9%.
4. NHAI argued that:
   • compensation should first be recalculated under First Schedule of 2013 Act;
   • only thereafter solatium should be computed.
5. High Court rejected contention because:
   • compensation awarded by CALA was never challenged by NHAI;
   • compensation had attained finality;
   • Section 30 mandates solatium on compensation already determined;
   • reopening award only for “notional computation” would unnecessarily prolong litigation.

(Paras 3 to 22)

---

FINAL DISPOSITION

• Appeals filed by NHAI dismissed.
• Appeals filed by land owners disposed of as not pressed.
• Award granting 100% solatium and interest upheld.

(Paras 23 and 24)