- Section 197 Cr.P.C. — Requirement of sanction — Determinative test
(Para 7, 9, 10)
Protection under Section 197(1) Cr.P.C. is available only to such public servants who are not removable from office save by or with the sanction of the Government. Subordinate rank police officers, who can be removed by authorities other than the Government, do not fall within this protected category; hence, no prior sanction is required for their prosecution.
-
Benefit of co-accused judgment — Not automatic
(Para 7, 10)
Where proceedings against a co-accused are quashed for want of sanction, such benefit does not automatically extend to other accused unless they independently satisfy the statutory requirement of Section 197 Cr.P.C. The applicability depends on the status and service conditions of each accused.
-
Stage of applicability of Section 197 — Cognizance stage decisive
(Para 14, 15)
The bar under Section 197 Cr.P.C. operates at the stage of taking cognizance. If, on the date of cognizance, no sanction is required, subsequent events (such as later notifications extending protection) do not invalidate the proceedings. A valid cognizance cannot be nullified retrospectively.
-
Effect of subsequent Government notification under Section 197(3)
(Para 11–14)
Notifications issued under Section 197(3) Cr.P.C. extending protection to additional categories (e.g., subordinate police officers) operate prospectively and do not affect proceedings where cognizance was already validly taken prior to such notification.
-
Post-cognizance sanction — Ineffective
(Para 14)
A sanction obtained after cognizance does not cure the defect where sanction was required at the initial stage; conversely, where no sanction was required at cognizance, later requirement or protection is irrelevant.
Core Ratio (One-Line Proposition)
Protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is determined at the stage of cognizance and applies only to those public servants who are removable only with Government sanction; such protection cannot be extended retrospectively nor claimed by co-accused unless independently satisfied.
No comments:
Post a Comment