Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action v. Union of India
Child Marriage – Constitutional Rights – Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (PCMA) – Scope and Enforcement – Directions issued for elimination of child marriage.
- Child Marriage – Nature and Character – Child marriage is a social evil and a criminal offence. The expression “child marriage” is itself paradoxical because a child lacks the capacity to make informed legal decisions while marriage imposes serious legal and social obligations. Child marriage deprives children of intellectual, social, educational and psychological development and exposes them to life-threatening risks. (Paras 2, 5)
- Child Marriage – Forced Marriage – All child marriages are forced marriages. Children are incapable of giving intelligent and informed consent to marriage. The practice is rooted in patriarchy, poverty, gender inequality, lack of education and socio-economic deprivation. (Paras 12-15, 48)
- Constitution of India – Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 – Right to Autonomy, Choice and Sexuality – Child marriage violates the rights of children, particularly girls, to bodily autonomy, sexuality, dignity, self-determination and free choice. The practice objectifies children and subjects them to compulsory heterosexuality and reproductive control. (Paras 175-178)
- Child Marriage – Adverse Consequences – Early marriage results in adolescent pregnancies, maternal morbidity and mortality, denial of education, economic dependence and inter-generational cycles of poverty and oppression. (Paras 15-18)
- Education – Fundamental Right – Child Marriage – Child marriage directly impairs the constitutional right to education and the right to development of children. Education and awareness are essential tools for preventing child marriage. (Paras 18, 190-194)
- Historical Development – Rukhmabai Case and Phulmoni Dasi Case – The judgment traces the evolution of legal opposition to child marriage through the struggles of Rukhmabai and the tragic death of Phulmoni Dasi, which contributed to legislative reforms concerning age of consent and marriage. (Paras 23-30)
- Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 – Beneficial Social Legislation – The PCMA replaced the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 and provides a comprehensive framework including annulment, maintenance, residence, custody, legitimacy of children, penal consequences and preventive measures. (Paras 39-42)
- Child Marriage – Voidable Marriage – A child marriage is voidable at the option of the contracting party who was a child at the time of marriage and a petition for annulment may be filed within the statutory period prescribed under Section 3 PCMA. (Paras 43-44)
- Maintenance – Residence – Custody – The PCMA protects child brides and children born from child marriages by providing for maintenance, residence, custody and welfare measures even after annulment of the marriage. (Paras 45-47, 51)
- Legitimacy of Children – Children born from child marriages remain legitimate notwithstanding annulment of the marriage. Legitimacy is a matter of dignity of the child and the law cannot permit children to suffer for circumstances beyond their control. (Paras 47-49)
- Penal Provisions – Sections 9, 10 and 11 PCMA – The Act punishes adult grooms, persons conducting or abetting child marriages and persons promoting or permitting such marriages. The object is deterrence and effective enforcement of the law. (Paras 52-62)
- Void Marriages – Section 12 PCMA – Child marriages involving kidnapping, enticement, force, fraud, trafficking, sale or exploitation of minors are void ab initio and non est in law. (Paras 63-64)
- Preventive Jurisdiction – Magistrates – Judicial Magistrates are empowered under Section 13 PCMA to issue injunctions preventing the solemnisation of child marriages on receiving credible information or even through suo motu action. (Paras 66-68)
- Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 – Child in Need of Care and Protection – A child facing imminent risk of marriage is a “child in need of care and protection”. Such children are entitled to protection, rehabilitation and intervention by Child Welfare Committees and other statutory authorities. (Paras 83-88)
- State Obligation – Child Rights – The State bears a positive constitutional obligation to protect children against child marriage through legal enforcement, rehabilitation, education, awareness generation and social support mechanisms. (Paras 205-209)
- Directions Issued – The Supreme Court directed strengthening of Child Marriage Prohibition Officers, proactive judicial intervention, accountability of public officials, community participation, awareness campaigns, sexuality education, technology-based monitoring, dedicated budgetary support and rehabilitation measures for affected children. (Paras 207 onwards; Directions under Part IX)
Held: Child marriage is incompatible with constitutional guarantees of dignity, autonomy, equality, health, education and development. Effective eradication of child marriage requires coordinated legal, administrative, educational and community-based measures, with strict enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 and protection of the rights of affected children.
(Paras 12-18, 43-68, 175-178, 190-209).
No comments:
Post a Comment